首页> 外文OA文献 >A Textbook Analysis : an In-depth Analysis of Activities in Scientific Approach\u27s Perspective in an Efl Textbook for Seventh Grade
【2h】

A Textbook Analysis : an In-depth Analysis of Activities in Scientific Approach\u27s Perspective in an Efl Textbook for Seventh Grade

机译:教科书分析:对七年级英语水平教科书中科学方法视角下活动的深入分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The need for teachers to analyze whether the textbook used applies learning approach demanded by the curriculum starts to raise. Therefore, this study aims to find out to what extent the activities given in the textbook follow the scientific approach in its design. This study belonged to descriptive evaluative method through content analysis. The main data were three chapters of the selected textbook. The texts were analyzed by using Task Analysis Sheet (TAS) adapted from Littlejohn (1998, in Tomlinson, 2011) rated by two experienced English teachers. The findings showed that in terms of physical appearence and types of activities the textbook was attractive since it is printed full color filled with pictures, illustration, various activities, songs, and games. However, the activities did not fully apply scientific approach as demanded by Curriculum 2013 since the five scientific learning activities were not evenly distributed. Questioning and Communicating activities existence were superior with 61% and 52% compared to Observing, Collecting information, and Associating ones with 22%, 14%, and 19% respectively.Therefore, considering the findings, it is suggested that the teachers should be always well prepared facing curriculum including the learning approach and textbooks changes by time goes by. Thus, they should be critical and creative once they found the lack of textbook provided by the government.
机译:开始需要教师分析所用教科书是否适用课程要求的学习方法。因此,本研究旨在找出教科书中规定的活动在设计上遵循科学方法的程度。通过内容分析,该研究属于描述性评估方法。主要数据是所选教科书的三章。通过使用任务分析表(TAS)对文本进行分析,任务分析表由Littlejohn(1998年,汤姆林森,2011年)改编,由两名经验丰富的英语老师评定。研究结果表明,就外观和活动类型而言,该教科书很有吸引力,因为它是全彩色印刷的,上面有图片,插图,各种活动,歌曲和游戏。但是,由于五项科学学习活动的分配不均,因此这些活动并未完全按照2013年课程的要求使用科学方法。提问和沟通活动的存在率分别比观察,收集信息和联系活动的发生率高(分别为61%和52%),分别为22%,14%和19%。因此,考虑到调查结果,建议教师应始终保持精心准备的面向课程,包括学习方法和教科书会随着时间的流逝而变化。因此,一旦发现政府提供的教科书不足,他们就应该具有批判性和创造性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号